Sunday, June 16, 2013

The North Korea Famine

The North Korea Famine or otherwise known as the Arduous March is a crisis that occurred in North Korea in the mid-Nineties where an estimated 200 thousand to 3.5 million people died due to man-made and natural causes.

Geographical nature                                                                                                                Geographically, the devastating floods in July 1995 caused by unusually heavy torrential rains triggered the crisis, according to observers. It damaged fertile lands and harvests as well as grain reserves that are stored underground thus causing the widespread shortage of food supply.

The Conflict                                                                                                                                          The Korean Famine that brought untold hardships to the North Korean people posed and contributed further to the conflict between the two Koreas.  It embarrassed the regime in the North who was forced to accept aid and reluctantly gave in to the demands from its supposed enemies, South Korea and its allies in the West such as the United States that it dismantle its nuclear capability.

Developmental History of the Conflict                                                                                                         The conflict evolved and developed after the Second World War.  The Korean Peninsula used to be a colony of Japan since 1910 and when it surrendered to the Allied forces at the end of the war, the peninsula was divided by the American administrators. The southern part was occupied by the United States and the northern part by the Soviet Union.  A political and geographical division called the 38th Parallel further divided Korea that eventually led to the North becoming under the Communist rule and the South, democratic. Inevitably, the Korean War started in 1950 when North Korean forces invaded South Korea and the conflict lasted up to the present time.  Until now, both countries are still technically at war despite the Armistice signed by both sides in July 27, 1953.

Primary perspectives on the conflict                                                                                                        
Primarily, the two perspectives on the conflict are those of  South and North Korea but the involvement of the both China and the U.S. are givens. 

What is at stake                                                                                                                                   The security and stability of South and North Korean people.  On a bigger picture, those of other Asian nations that are directly and indirectly affected by the conflict are also at stake such as Japan, Taiwan as well as those in the Southeast Asian region.

Consequences and repurcussions of the conflict                                         

As a consequence, the conflict created a wedge between the US and Russia and brought about The Cold War, an uneasy period between the Fifties and the late Eighties.  It was a time when the U.S. feared that communism will spread throughout Asia in domino style thereby pushing it into the messy Vietnam War. At the time, communism was considered as evil and the world was divided into two camps, the pro-US on one side and the pro-Soviet Russia on the other. Former U.S. President Reagan even called Russia the "Evil Empire".

Current status of the conflict                                                                                          
 In the light of the recent provocative gestures of the newly-installed North Korean leader Kim Jong-un, the world is constantly on the watch on unpredictable developments now taking place inside the belligerent nation.  Just recently, North Korea fired three short-range guided missiles that landed into the sea of Japan. Many dismissed though that such tests are not unusual.  The world is so keen on watching every bit of events, big or small, inside the hermit nation that even reports about Kim’s fathering a baby with an unknown woman in 2010 became press fodder.

STEPS TOWARDS RESOLUTION

Steps taken by South Korea to resolve the conflict                                                                                                           1.  The adoption of measures through the enactment of its Inter-Korean Exchange and Cooperation Act and consequently the Inter-Korean Cooperation Fund as offshoots of the “Korean National Community Formula” framework; 
2. The promotion of various joint projects with North Korea in the late 1990s and the increased humanitarian assistance to the North that resulted into the first summit between the leaders of the two Koreas. These efforts encouraged the increase in the South-North exchanges and cooperation. Significant by-products of these exchanges are the Kaeseong Industrial Complex, the Gyeongui and Donghae railways, and the Mt. Guemgang Tourism Project.

How successful have they been?                                                                                                                              The Kaeseong Industrial complex is a clear example of the success of the South Korean initiatives.  It provided employment to thousands of people both in North and South Korea.  It became the conduit for the much needed currency to finance the government in the north.  Moreover, 390,000 South and North Koreans have crossed the border to re-establish old family ties, $2.9 billion in humanitarian aid has been given and trade amounted to US$14.8 billion.                                                     

Chief factors contributing to the success or failure of the attempts at resolution                                                                                                       Mainly, the factors that contributed to the success of the attempts to resolve the conflict are the sincere desire of South Koreans to reach out to the North and make peace and help their fellow Koreans living in the North and the combined efforts of the members of the international community to establish peace in the region. The reasons for its failure is the stubborn attitude, obsolete political rhetoric and belligerent stance of the regimes in the North as shown by its unwillingness to abide by its treaty with the South to abandon its nuclear development efforts; and its apparent intentions to sabotage the elusive peace in the Peninsula.  Despite strong denials, the findings of the multinational investigation in the sinking of the South Korean Patrol Ship Cheonan in March 26, 2010 concluded that a North Korean submarine torpedoed the patrol vessel.

Unification of the two Koreas ultimate solution                                                                                                                   Personally, I am for the eventual unification of the two Koreas because if that happens, Korea could become like Germany today, united and prosperous. I believe that a unified Korea has the potential of becoming a great nation given the showing of South Korea that rose from the ashes and became an industrial giant in just a little over than four decades. There is something in the culture of the Koreans that shows it can achieve anything if it wants to.  

Actions needed to resolve the conflict in a satisfactory manner                                                                                                                              To resolve the Korean conflict, there should be bilateral efforts between the two Koreas to find solutions to their conflict:                                                                                                                                                                  1. First both must absolutely agree that they’re no longer at war (replace the Armistice with a more permanent peace treaty);
2. On the part of the North, abandon its nuclear development efforts and;
3. Get back to the conference table with the U.S. and China as major facilitators in creating joint efforts for unification.

REFERENCES: Wikipedia; KoreaOrbit.com;  AnswersTM;  The Telegraph and Korea.net for additional facts.

Answer to Question in likeplum.com 2013-05.  Edited for Le Plume

Should a Multinational Corporation (MNC) reduce its ethical standards to compete?



A Multinational Corporation should not reduce its ethical standards to compete.  While it may gain temporary competitive advantage in the short term by lowering its benchmarks for best practices, its business may suffer in the long run.  History shows many examples of MNCs whose business and reputation suffered because of the backlash of their questionable international dealings.